Too Tired? Too Anxious? Need More Time? We’ve got your back.
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS:
This should be about 600 words with at least 3 APA7 references.
Free of grammatical errors. I am still looking for some luck on this page. Most of my answers could have been a lot better, so don’t pick this up if you can’t answer. I will reject any mediocre solutions right away.
Questions
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the waterfall approach to system development.
What are the pros and cons in reference to an organization’s buy versus build decision? Explain why you would choose one method over the other.
HOW TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT(EXAMPLE ESSAY / DRAFT)
Introduction System development is a crucial process for any organization that seeks to improve its operations and achieve its objectives. One of the primary considerations that organizations make when developing new systems is the approach they use. The waterfall approach is one of the oldest and most traditional methods of system development, while the buy versus build decision is a crucial consideration for organizations seeking to implement new systems. This essay explores the advantages and disadvantages of the waterfall approach and the pros and cons of the buy versus build decision.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Waterfall Approach to System Development The waterfall approach is a sequential model that consists of several stages, including planning, design, development, testing, and maintenance. One of the main advantages of this approach is that it is structured and predictable. Each stage is completed before moving to the next, ensuring that errors are detected early and corrected before they escalate. Additionally, the waterfall approach is easy to understand, and the results are often well-documented.
However, the waterfall approach also has several disadvantages. First, it is inflexible and does not allow for changes to be made once a stage has been completed. This can lead to delays and increased costs if changes need to be made later in the development process. Second, the approach does not prioritize customer satisfaction and may result in a system that does not meet the organization’s needs. Third, the testing phase is often left until the end of the development process, which can result in costly errors and delays.
Pros and Cons of the Buy versus Build Decision The buy versus build decision is a crucial consideration for organizations seeking to implement new systems. Building a system in-house provides the organization with greater control over the development process and allows for customization to meet specific needs. On the other hand, buying an existing system can save time and reduce costs.
One of the main advantages of building a system in-house is that it allows for greater control and customization. The organization can tailor the system to meet its specific needs, ensuring that it is the best fit for the organization’s operations. Additionally, building a system in-house provides the organization with greater control over the development process, ensuring that the system is developed in accordance with the organization’s standards.
However, building a system in-house also has several disadvantages. First, it can be costly and time-consuming, requiring significant resources in terms of finances and personnel. Second, the organization may lack the necessary expertise to build a complex system, resulting in delays and errors. Third, building a system in-house can be a distraction from the organization’s core business activities, taking away valuable resources from other critical areas.
On the other hand, buying an existing system can save time and reduce costs. The organization can take advantage of the expertise of the system provider, ensuring that the system is developed to a high standard. Additionally, buying an existing system can reduce the risks associated with system development, ensuring that the system is fully functional and meets the organization’s needs.
However, buying an existing system also has several disadvantages. First, the organization may need to compromise on the system’s features and functionality, as it may not be fully customized to meet the organization’s specific needs. Second, the organization may become dependent on the system provider, which can lead to additional costs and reduced flexibility in the long term. Third, buying an existing system can result in a loss of control over the development process, potentially leading to delays and errors.
Conclusion In conclusion, the waterfall approach and the buy versus build decision are crucial considerations for organizations seeking to implement new systems. The waterfall approach offers a structured and predictable development process, but it is inflexible and may not prioritize customer satisfaction.
Too Tired? Too Anxious? Need More Time? We’ve got your back.