Too Tired? Too Anxious? Need More Time? We’ve got your back.
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS:
Review Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. Sisters of Charity and Barnes Hospital v. Collector of Revenue
How did to courts take such similar cases and reach opposite conclusions
Which of the two interpretations do you find more persuasive
What about leasing hospital space to vendors such as a McDonald’s Restaurant How might that affect tax exemption
HOW TO WORK ON THIS ASSIGNMENT (EXAMPLE ESSAY / DRAFT)
The cases of Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. Sisters of Charity and Barnes Hospital v. Collector of Revenue both dealt with the issue of tax exemption for non-profit hospitals. Surprisingly, these cases, which had similar factual scenarios, resulted in opposite conclusions by the courts.
In Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. Sisters of Charity, the court ruled that the hospital did not qualify for tax exemption because it engaged in certain activities, such as offering discounts to preferred providers, that were deemed to be for-profit in nature. On the other hand, the court in Barnes Hospital v. Collector of Revenue held that the hospital was entitled to tax exemption because it provided substantial charity care to the community.
Both courts relied on the same legal standard for tax exemption, which requires a showing that the hospital is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes. However, the courts interpreted this standard differently in light of the facts of each case.
Personally, I find the Barnes Hospital v. Collector of Revenue decision more persuasive. While it is important to scrutinize the activities of non-profit hospitals to ensure they are not engaging in for-profit activities, it seems unreasonable to deny tax exemption simply because a hospital offers discounts to preferred providers. The provision of substantial charity care, as recognized in the Barnes Hospital case, should be the primary consideration when determining whether a hospital is entitled to tax exemption.
Leasing hospital space to vendors, such as a McDonald’s restaurant, can have implications for a hospital’s tax exemption status. If a significant portion of a hospital’s space is leased to for-profit entities, the IRS may view this as evidence that the hospital is engaging in activities that are not exclusively for charitable purposes. However, if the lease is structured in a way that ensures the hospital retains control over the space and the activities of the vendor, the tax exemption may still be preserved. Ultimately, it depends on the specific facts of each case and how the lease is structured.
Too Tired? Too Anxious? Need More Time? We’ve got your back.